lichess.org
Donate

Did Puzzles actually improve your chess

I'm not great, had cracked 2000, now 1880 again. After two years of consistent puzzling, I am finding tactics more quickly in my games.
Yes, when used to focus on weaknesses.
In general, I hate getting things wrong, that slows me down, time pressure anxiety leads to mistakes. Puzzles made me even slower; belief in one solution is a bad habit and compounds my sin.
But...
Pattern recognition improves speed. To improve it, I focus on one theme, it was “Clearance”, now “Deflection” next’ll be “Skewer”. I bang away at the Easier (-300) level, unconsciously building that precious pattern library while ignoring the occasional googly that defies classification.
<Comment deleted by user>
Yeah quite a bit. But my puzzle is kinda variable like if today I am 2450 then tomorrow I'd be 2150
Partly,they only help if they happen in games and if you have good memory .(only what I think)
Six months ago I was 1400 and hanging important pieces every other game. I decided to fix that by completing a large set of mate-in-1 puzzles. Six months and 51,000 mate-in-1s later, and I'm 1730 and feeling so much better about my chess. Puzzles definitely helped my chess considerably.
I think it helps with tactics a little bit. But not as much as people think they do. Some people are always like Do 120 puzzles a day or smth like that. Personally, just 5-15 a week is fine. Just my thoughts and experience.
They did help me but only after I started incorporating "tactic-checks" in my thought process during the games which required switching to 30+20 time control. But here I mean demanding puzzles which require some calculation.

I have also recently started doing some puzzle streaks here and I think they should be quite good for blitz. I wonder though why I am doing them as I don't play blitz these days .
If you only have a short time available, say under half an hour, I think that puzzles are a much better use of your time than playing fast time controls. They will teach you to think properly, instead of moving intuitively.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.